<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cadillac Ranch at Dusk with Nikon 50mm 1.4 G</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scrapallier.com/2008/12/22/cadillac-ranch-at-dusk-with-nikon-50mm-1-4-g/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scrapallier.com/2008/12/22/cadillac-ranch-at-dusk-with-nikon-50mm-1-4-g/</link>
	<description>Scrapallier Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:48:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: need fast cash today</title>
		<link>http://blog.scrapallier.com/2008/12/22/cadillac-ranch-at-dusk-with-nikon-50mm-1-4-g/comment-page-1/#comment-50949</link>
		<dc:creator>need fast cash today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 02:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glendale.directrouter.com/~scrapall/blog/?p=173#comment-50949</guid>
		<description>hey there and thank you for your info – I’ve certainly picked up anything new from right here. I did however expertise several technical points using this website, since I experienced to reload the web site a lot of times previous to I could get it to load correctly. I had been wondering if your hosting is OK? Not that I&#039;m complaining, but sluggish loading instances times will often affect your placement in google and could damage your high-quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I’m adding this RSS to my email and could look out for a lot more of your respective intriguing content. Make sure you update this again soon..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey there and thank you for your info – I’ve certainly picked up anything new from right here. I did however expertise several technical points using this website, since I experienced to reload the web site a lot of times previous to I could get it to load correctly. I had been wondering if your hosting is OK? Not that I&#8217;m complaining, but sluggish loading instances times will often affect your placement in google and could damage your high-quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I’m adding this RSS to my email and could look out for a lot more of your respective intriguing content. Make sure you update this again soon..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hollygtn</title>
		<link>http://blog.scrapallier.com/2008/12/22/cadillac-ranch-at-dusk-with-nikon-50mm-1-4-g/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Hollygtn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glendale.directrouter.com/~scrapall/blog/?p=173#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Blog comments lost in migration 01/10:
#
Andrew says:
December 30, 2008 at 12:02 pm

The rule of thumb for full-frame (35mm or FX sensor) is that the shutter speed should be 1/ the lens focal length to get sharp images of a stationary subject. However with the APS-C size sensor on your D90, the equivalent full-frame focal length is 1.5 x the actual focal length you are using. So with the 50mm lens, the equivalent full-frame focal length is 75mm, so 1/75 sec would be the slowest shutter speed for a sharp image of a stationary subject. Actually this rule is a bit conservative, 1/60 would probably be OK.

You were shooting 1/8 to 1/30th of a second, so this was a bit slow for a hand-held shot. A tripod would definitely have improved image sharpness. The other benefit would be that for the images that don’t have people in them, you could have gone down to 1 second or so, and reduced your ISO to 200, to reduce the noise.

Regards,
Andrew
#
Dailyscrapper says:
December 31, 2008 at 11:30 am

I know that place very well. I grew up in Amarillo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blog comments lost in migration 01/10:<br />
#<br />
Andrew says:<br />
December 30, 2008 at 12:02 pm</p>
<p>The rule of thumb for full-frame (35mm or FX sensor) is that the shutter speed should be 1/ the lens focal length to get sharp images of a stationary subject. However with the APS-C size sensor on your D90, the equivalent full-frame focal length is 1.5 x the actual focal length you are using. So with the 50mm lens, the equivalent full-frame focal length is 75mm, so 1/75 sec would be the slowest shutter speed for a sharp image of a stationary subject. Actually this rule is a bit conservative, 1/60 would probably be OK.</p>
<p>You were shooting 1/8 to 1/30th of a second, so this was a bit slow for a hand-held shot. A tripod would definitely have improved image sharpness. The other benefit would be that for the images that don’t have people in them, you could have gone down to 1 second or so, and reduced your ISO to 200, to reduce the noise.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Andrew<br />
#<br />
Dailyscrapper says:<br />
December 31, 2008 at 11:30 am</p>
<p>I know that place very well. I grew up in Amarillo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

